Teacher and Peer Online Feedback in EFL Writing: Effects on Writing Performance and Affective Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v11i2.2781Keywords:
affective domain, argumentative writing, peer feedback, Teacher feedback, writing outcomesAbstract
The study aims to examine the effects of teacher and peer online feedback on learners’ writing performance, motivation, self-efficacy, and anxiety in writing among EFL learners in Indonesia. A quasi-experimental design was employed with two intact classes that were non-randomly assigned to the treatment groups. 40 EFL learners from one public university in Indonesia were divided into two groups, with 25 learners receiving teacher feedback and 15 learners receiving peer feedback over a period of eight meetings within four weeks. An argumentative writing rubric for pre- and post-tests and a set of questionnaires measuring motivation, self-efficacy, and anxiety in writing were used to obtain the data. The data analysis involved the writing assessment with two raters using the validated rubrics and both parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses. The results showed that the writing performance with teacher feedback significantly differed from the peer feedback, as indicated by their post-test mean scores (p = .009). Of the three variables, even though the results showed a slight improvement, none of them showed a significant difference between the peer feedback and teacher feedback groups in their mean scores. The results showed no significant differences in writing motivation (p= 0.468), self-efficacy (p=0.95), and writing anxiety (p= 0.174) in their mean scores. Implications for online feedback and learners’ readiness to give online feedback and learners’ readiness in giving feedback are discussed.
References
Agawa, T., & Takeuchi, O. (2016). A new questionnaire to assess Japanese EFL learners' motivation: Development and validation. ARELE: Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 27, 1–16.
Alharbi, M. A., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Turnitin peer feedback: Controversial vs. non-controversial essays. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00195-1
Allen, D., & Mills, A. (2016). The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814561902
Cahyono, B. Y., & Rahayu, T. (2020). Efl students'motivation in writing, writing proficiency, and gender. Teflin Journal, 31(2), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i2/162-180
Can, G., & Walker, A. (2014). Social science doctoral students' needs and preferences for written feedback. Higher Education, 68(2), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9713-5
Campbell, C. W., & Batista, B. (2023). To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100218
Cao, S., Zhou, S., Luo, Y., Wang, T., Zhou, T., & Xu, Y. (2022). A review of the ESL/EFL learners' gains from online peer feedback on English writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1035803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035803
Chen, W., Liu, D., & Lin, C. (2023). Collaborative peer feedback in L2 writing: Affective, behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1078141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078141
Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., & De Gispert, I. (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task, and social participation. Computers & Education, 75, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.015
Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., Gai, X., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Effects of trained peer vs. teacher feedback on EFL students’ writing performance, self-efficacy, and internalization of motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 788474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788474
Delante, N. L. (2017). Perceived impact of online written feedback on students' writing and learning: A reflection. Reflective Practice, 18(6), 772–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1351351
Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903197883
Fidan, M., & Çarkıt, C. (2026). The effect of teacher feedback on improving 6th-grade students' L1 writing performance and motivation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 42(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2025.2546814
Gan, Z., An, Z., & Liu, F. (2021). Teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation, and feedback behavior: How are they associated with learning outcomes? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 697045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045
Ghane, M. H., Razmi, M. H., Dehghanpoor, F., & Nematollahi, R. (2024). The impact of written corrective feedback on students' writing performance, self-efficacy, and anxiety. Journal of Writing Research, 16(2), 271–321. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.16.02.04
Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Alvarez, I. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 34(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835772
Håkansson Lindqvist, M., & Pettersson, F. (2019). Digitalization and school leadership: On the complexity of leading for digitalization in school. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(3), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0126
Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.001
Hauge, T. E. (2014). Uptake and use of technology: Bridging design for teaching and learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.942750
Ion, G., Sánchez Martí, A., & Agud Morell, I. (2019). Giving or receiving feedback: Which is more beneficial to students' learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1484881
Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2024). Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2081209
Khanlarzadeh, M., & Nemati, M. (2016). The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2016.20365
Lam, S. T. E. (2021). A web-based feedback platform for peer and teacher feedback on writing: An Activity Theory perspective. Computers and Composition, 62, 102666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102666
Lee, I. (2022). Developments in classroom-based research on L2 writing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(4), 551–574. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.2
Lee, M.-K., & Evans, M. (2019). Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12598
Li, L., & Grion, V. (2019). The power of giving feedback and receiving feedback in peer assessment. AISHE-J, 11(2), 1–17.
Liu, F., Du, J., Zhou, D. Q., & Huang, B. (2021). Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups. Assessing Writing, 47, 100482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100482
Lv, X., Ren, W., & Xie, Y. (2021). The effects of online feedback on ESL/EFL writing: A meta-analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00594-6
Martin, I. A., & Sippel, L. (2024). Providing vs. receiving peer feedback: Learners' beliefs and experiences. Language Teaching Research, 28(3), 1033–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211024365
Öztürk, M., Yüce, E., & Türker, P. M. (2025). Online peer feedback versus online teacher feedback: Effect of online feedback on students' self-regulated learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09812-8
Pajares, F., Hartley, J., & Valiante, G. (2001). Response format in writing self-efficacy assessment: Greater discrimination increases prediction. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 33(4), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2001.12069012
Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
Peungcharoenkun, T., & Waluyo, B. (2024). Students' affective engagements in peer feedback across offline and online English learning environments in Thai higher education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00286-w
Ravand, H., Effatpanah, F., Kunina-Habenicht, O., & Madison, M. J. (2025). A didactic illustration of writing skill growth through a longitudinal diagnostic classification model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1521808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1521808
Razmi, M. H., & Ghane, M. H. (2024). The impact of written corrective feedback on students’ writing performance, self-efficacy, and anxiety. Journal of Writing Research, 16(2), 271–321. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.16.02.04
Ruegg, R. (2014). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students' writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.958190
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Sari, E., & Han, T. (2024). The impact of automated writing evaluation on English as a foreign language learners’ writing self-efficacy, self-regulation, anxiety, and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(5), 2065–2080. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13004
Setyowati, L., & Sukmawan, S. (2021). News as authentic materials to improve essay writing in a hybrid learning setting. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 1194–1208. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.19851
Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601
Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020). The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821
Thompson, A. S., & Lee, J. (2018). The motivational factors questionnaire in the Korean EFL context: Predicting group membership according to English proficiency and multilingual status. The Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1130082
Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback, and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247
Tsai, H. M. (2008). The development of an English writing anxiety scale for institute of technology English majors. Journal of Education and Psychology, 31(3), 81–107.
Tsao, J.-J., Tseng, W.-T., & Wang, C. (2017). The effects of writing anxiety and motivation on EFL college students’ self-evaluative judgments of corrective feedback. Psychological Reports, 120(2), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116687123
Waluyo, B., & Panmei, B. (2024). Students' peer feedback engagements in online English courses facilitated by a social network in Thailand. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(2), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2305
Weng, F., Ye, S. X., & Xue, W. (2023). The effects of peer feedback on L2 students’ writing motivation: An experimental study in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00669-y
Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39(4), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.017
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023). Assessor writing performance on peer feedback: Exploring the relation between assessor writing performance, problem identification accuracy, and helpfulness of peer feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(1), 118–[verify end page]. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000768
Yang, M., Mak, P., & Yuan, R. (2021). Feedback experience of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Voices from pre-service English language teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00618-1
Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020). Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large-scale study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451
Zhang, X. (2019). Exploring the relationship between college students' writing anxiety and the pedagogical use of online resources. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0149-y
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 973–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179
Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Effects of technology-enhanced peer, teacher, and self-feedback on students' collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency, and engagement in learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(1), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09337-y
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



